Jason Trout model

thingiverse

<h1>NATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT TEST WILL FORCE SCHOOLS TO FOCUS ON IMPORTANT, PERFORMANCE-BASED OUTCOMES</h1> Some proposals for a national achievement test include writing samples. Others would require students to give practical demonstrations in subjects like music and the natural sciences. Most advocates of national examinations stress the value of performance-based assessments. They argue that <a href="https://www.wikihow.com/Write-an-Essay">students</a> should demonstrate whether they can organize their thoughts, analyze information, and formulate arguments. In short, tests need to determine whether students can apply the knowledge they have learned. Scoring performance-based exams is more complicated than scoring multiple-choice exams. But the experience of other countries like Germany, England, and Japan shows that this type of exam works. With proper training and monitoring, different people can learn to assess performance-based exams according to a common standard. A NATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT TEST DOES NOT HAVE TO MEAN A NATIONAL CURRICULUM Some countries with national exams--France and Japan, for instance--have strict national curriculums. Germany, like the United States, considers education mainly the responsibility of the individual states who can <a href="https://writeanypapers.com/">write my paper for cheap</a>. Each state follows its own curriculum; though all states follow the same format for the German exam, each decides on the specific questions it will ask. Achievement tests work best when they explicitly relate to curriculums. The German experience shows that even when curriculum and assessment fall under local authority, a national examination system can still work. If we hold all U.S. schools to a shared standard, however, we will need to coordinate our efforts. Just as a national system of achievement testing need not entail a national curriculum, it need not entail a single test for everyone. We can construct multiple tests for different subjects.